Tuesday, September 7, 2010 - 4:05 PM

An Iranian woman who received a stoning sentence could be executed -- possibly in a week's time after Ramadan ends -- but will Secretary Clinton do anything to save her?
France's foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, said Sept. 6 that the case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani has become his "personal cause" and declared, "I'm ready to do anything to save her. If I must go to Tehran to save her, I'll go to Tehran."
Today, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso called the stoning sentence "barbaric beyond words." In late July, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva offered Ashtiani asylum, though he was rebuffed by Iran. The Vatican is considering using behind-the-scenes diplomacy to save the woman's life. People worldwide have held demonstrations, such as the Aug. 5 one in Berlin, as seen above.
Clinton's only public effort on Ashtiani's behalf has basically amounted to an Aug. 10 statement in which she said, "We remain troubled by the case of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani" "Troubled" is putting it mildly; horrified is more like it.
Of course, the United States does not have official relations with Iran, and Clinton must consider how anything she does on Ashtiani's behalf would affect other Iran-related issues, such as the country's nuclear program and support for Hezbollah.
Still, being a defender of persecuted women is right up Clinton's alley; it's something she's deeply passionate about. So, it's disheartening that one of the world's most powerful women isn't doing or can't do more.
Ashtiani's stoning sentence for adultery was stayed in July after international outcry, and Iran has said she could be hanged instead. Her fate is unclear. Her son told a Paris news conference by phone on Sept. 6 that he fears his mother could be executed after Ramadan ends late this week.
(If you wish to send a message to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei about this case, you can do so through Amnesty International's website by clicking here.)
When you ask "but will Secretary Clinton do anything to save her?" I think it's important to remember a few things (in my opinion)- first, Secretary Clinton has spoken out very forcefully against human rights abuses in Iran- more so than probably any other member of the administration. She has a difficult diplomatic dance to do, as you noted in your post- she is the public face of the tough new sanctions against Iran and while she certainly hasn't called for military action against Iran, many members of Congress have been none to subtle about wanting this- in other words, Iran may not be inclined to do what the US wants for domestic political reasons (ie. they don't want the perception among strict sharia followers to be that they "caved" to US pressure). In fact, there is always the possibility repeated public statements could could backfire. Also, as you mentioned, it's hard to effect change when we have zero diplomatic relations with Iran.
Second, I think it's an oversimplification to think that even the very powerful US can prevent another sovereign nation from administering judgment according to their laws, no matter how draconian that judgment is. Clinton can't simply swoop down and rescue the woman. We even had a hard time convincing our ally Scotland to not release the Lockerbie bomber. In other words, I am not sure how the US could intercede here. We also don't know what is taking place behind the scenes.
Third, and perhaps most important, Secretary Clinton has been tirelessly working for the release of the three American hikers imprisoned in Iran- she may be hesitant to do or say anything that could in any way jeopardize their status in a negative way.
I'm not saying the US and Secy Clinton shouldn't speak out forcefully, but rather that there are a bunch of factors which need to be considered before anyone automatically assumes that somehow Secretary Clinton isn't doing all she can to help. I don't doubt for a minute that she is very concerned by this case and she probably wants to make sure anything she says or does will help and not hurt.
I think the global movement to help Ashtiani is probably the most effective way of changing her situation because it isolates Iran even more- even from some of its allies and individuals such as the Pope and other religious leaders who may hold more sway with Iran's leaders. As we speak, apparently the Iranian government has suspended the death sentence and it may be a result of the global outcry. A suspension doesn't mean she is off the hook completely, but its a sign that the global outcry may be working.
Just my 0.02 cents
***********************************
Secretary Clinton Blog
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE