Posted By P.J. Aroon Share

Hillary Clinton, Ban Ki-moon, Sept. 30, 2009 | STAN HONDA/AFP/Getty Images 

Remember how Secretary Clinton got to preside over a session of the U.N. Security Council last week and led an effort to pass a resolution against wartime rape? Well this one sentence from Clinton has some people in Sri Lanka fuming:

We’ve seen rape used as a tactic of war before in Bosnia, Burma, Sri Lanka, and elsewhere.

Sri Lanka lodged gave a "note of protest" to the U.S. Embassy in Colombo, complaining about Clinton's suggestion that Sri Lankan security forces used rape as a weapon of war against Tamil LTTE rebels. "We vehemently reject and condemn the irresponsible statement made by US State Secretary Hillary Clinton," the country's defense spokesman was quoted as saying in the state newspaper.

Meanwhile, the prime minister said on a radio program that Clinton has apparently forgotten the Monica Lewinsky affair and should tend to her own backyard before alleging that women are being maltreated in other countries. There was also this rant in Sri Lanka's state-run newspaper.

The State Department's 2008 Human Rights Report had this to say about wartime sexual violence in Sri Lanka:

Civil society activists reported that the resumption of the conflict had led to an increase in gender-based violence perpetrated by the security forces. Statistics were unavailable because few, if any, charges were filed in such incidents. For example, human rights groups in northern districts alleged that the wives of men who had disappeared and who suffered economic deprivation as a result often fell prey to sexual exploitation by paramilitaries and members of the security forces."

A January 2002 Amnesty International report titled "Sri Lanka: Rape in Custody" said this:

In Sri Lanka, like in many other countries, incidents of rape in the context of armed conflict such as the above examples are reported on a regular basis. During 2001, Amnesty International has noted a marked rise in allegations of rape by police, army and navy personnel."

That's one of the tricky things about being a Western outsider to a developing country. No matter how true and legitimate one's criticisms of human rights violations may be, it rankles locals when it comes from someone perceived as a "neocolonialist" outsider. It's one thing when criticism comes from your fellow citizen; it's quite another thing when it comes from an outside "meddler." Hopefully Clinton will be able to use her star diplomacy skills to advance human rights while not coming across as a judgmental outsider -- which she, of course, isn't. Based on Sri Lanka's reaction, though, it can be a tough job.

Photo: STAN HONDA/AFP/Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

MODERATEWINGER

1:44 AM ET

October 9, 2009

And apparently

Secretary Clinton hit a nerve when addressing Sri Lanka and its horrible human rights abuses. Hillary was just calling it like she saw it.

 

AFRICAFOREVER

6:38 PM ET

October 9, 2009

the author of this article made a serious omission

Interestingly, the author of this article omitted a very significant correction of Clinton's remarks made by the State Department. Philip J. Crowley, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the U.S. State Department said on the record at the State Department's Foreign Press Center on Wednesday October 7, 2009, the following: "The Sri Lankan government sought to clarify, you know, that particular reference. Melanne Verveer, who is our ambassador at large for women's issues, sent a letter over the weekend to the Sri Lankan government clarifying that the reference that the secretary made, you know, was to, you know, very well-documented reports of significant levels of rape that were documented through, I think, 2002 or 2003 in a variety of reports, including State Department reports and also reports done by Amnesty International."

The State Department's Crowley continued to say that "At the same time, Ambassador Verveer did clarify that the reference was not specifically to the most recent phase of the tragic conflict in Sri Lanka. That said, you know, in her letter Ambassador Verveer, you know, indicated that Secretary Clinton has a significant interest in looking to see how the United States can help Sri Lanka move forward."

Most importantly, the State Department's Melanne Verveer wrote one week ago in her letter to Sri Lanka’s foreign ministry that the U.S. State Department has “not received reports that rape and sexual abuse were used as tools of war in Sri Lanka in the most recent phase of the conflict, from 2006 to 2009.”

One wonders why Verveer's letter of significant clarification, which was widely reported on in Sri Lanka's media outlets one week ago, was not referred to in the FP article. The clarification letter is significant in part because the Rajapaksa administration did not rule in the years prior to 2006. Now if the Secretary's intent was to provide a history lesson, then perhaps it is time for her to look in the mirror and mention her nation's special record on these matters. Overall, the selective reporting and omissions in the article are inappropriate and irresponsible. Whose interests do these omissions serve?

 

P.J. AROON

10:17 PM ET

October 9, 2009

'Omission' wasn't deliberate

Thanks for commenting. The "omission" wasn't deliberate; I simply wasn't aware of Verveer's letter or Crowley's remarks. At the time I wrote the post, no mention was made of them in the English-language news articles I found on the Internet and Nexis. This blog is composed of quickly written informal posts, not rigorously edited formal articles. That's why it's helpful to have comments from people around the world!

 

CHAMINDA_T@HOTMAI.COM

10:02 PM ET

October 11, 2009

weapons of war - conflict of interest?

LTTE have been using women as suicide bombers from the inception of the concept. Indian Prime Minister Rajiev Gandhi’s assignation by a female suicide bomber is a prime example of this doctrine. There is even documented evidence of usage of PREGNANT women for this ghastly act. There is also evidence captured on film of LTTE hacking mothers with babies in arms. If Mrs Hilary Clinton’s mission is to bring to justice the ‘perpetrators of crimes against women’ in Sri Lanka, then she had documented proof whom to go for. Also, if she had turned to all that all American intelligence agency, the CIA, they could have confirmed that some of the Tamil Diaspora in the USA is party to funding this grisly act. They even could have confirmed that these fundraisers, also fund election campaigns of non other than Mrs Clinton’s – do we see a conflict of interest!

So, the question has to be asked, has Mrs Clinton got blood on her hands and is she really the person to who should represent the welfare of women? It is now up to the United Nations to access the situation with regard to Mrs Clinton and also the war crimes committed by America globally and act accordingly.

 

Madam Secretary is an obsessive blog about all things Hillary Clinton. From her policies to her pantsuits, Madam Secretary delivers up-to-the-minute news, analysis, and gossip about America's top diplomat.