The State Department confirmed yesterday that Secretary Clinton will depart for her first official trip abroad as secretary on February 15, with stops in Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, and China.

So, for our weekly Hillary Poll, we asked our panel of experts for some diplomatic travel advice:

What is the gaffe or mistake secretaries of state should avoid at all costs on their first official trip overseas?

Les Gelb:

The so-called gaffes and blunders that reverberate in the news for a few days don't mean a damn thing -- even if Hillary makes a dumb move, which she will not.

The real rookie mistake is just to treat these initial trips as photo and goodwill voyages. The truth is they represent genuine opportunties for the Secretary of State to demonstratrate that the trip means something, something important. And what's truly important to the hosts and to us is for HRC to lay out a strategy for future American relations with our closest allies and with important nations.

The hosts want America to lead, contrary to what foreign policy simpletons assert, and they want the United States to put forward a strategy that will help solve problems -- theirs and ours. HRC has the chance to show how we intend to build bond and solve problems. And the mistake would be to squander this initial opening on rhetorical baloney.

Stephen Walt:

Secretary Clinton will stumble if she treats each Asian capital like a campaign stop and approaches foreign leaders as if they were voters she is trying to win over. That's what senators do, and what she did for over a year while running for president, but that's not how the Secretary of State ought to act.

She is now Diplomat-in-Chief of the most powerful country on earth, and while treating her foreign counterparts with respect, she also doesn't want to pander or (dare I say it?) kowtow. Instead, she should articulate U.S. interests and goals clearly, listen carefully to what her interlocutors have to say, and make it clear that the more help we get from them, the more help they can expect from us.

She also has to take care not to be either too confrontational with the Chinese or too accommodating with long-time allies like Japan. One of America's great diplomatic assets is its ability to play different regional powers off against each other, and this requires some delicate diplomatic balancing. Our leverage will be maximized if Asian countries understand that we can be a major asset for them, while being subtly reminded that U.S. support cannot be taken for granted.

Dov Zakheim:
Secretary Clinton needs to tread very carefully on the thin ice of the North Korean nuclear issue. With all the press reports of a possible missile test by Pyongyang, our allies -- and China -- will hang on every word she uses to address this matter. She must take care not to signal in any way that we are prepared to countenance bad behavior by the North, and that such behavior will immediately terminate any commitments that Chris Hill may have offered in his negotiations with the North Korean regime. We will be back to square one.

David Rothkopf:

I have few worries about what will be in her briefing books or on her agenda. It is also highly unlikely to me that given her experience and her persona that she will make a grand public gaffe along the way.

Rather, my greatest concern is about what will happen out of sight of the cameras...and indeed, beyond the sight of anyone. I am concerned about the far too commonplace, invisible, odorless killer of American diplomacy: the failure to listen. It is tempting to think that these trips are all about America, what the new administration thinks, about hitting the talking points hard.

But everywhere -- and in Asia in particular -- first encounters need to be about establishing relationships. Eye contact and sincere attentiveness are likely to send a stronger message about what is new and important in Obama-era foreign policy than the most powerful prose a career diplomat can craft for his boss.

Hillary Clinton should learn from the mistake of past diplomats -- and of the stimulus package: She doesn't have to do it all at once. She needs to meet top officials and connect with them, laying the foundation for successful long-term collaborations.

Wonks too easily underestimate the great and vital power of personal diplomacy. The greatest diplomats do not. She needs to hear what Asian leaders are hoping for and worrying about with regard to the relationship.

Yes, of course, we have agendas in each of these countries and if progress can be made, that is great. But the message most important to those at the top in Asia will be that they and the region are important to the U.S. (her trip is an excellent way to send that message) and that we are not the hamfisted hegemon but are seeking to be a constructive partner in the Asia-Pacific region. If there are difficult messages to deliver, like to China on their currency, by all means, deliver them...but in private.

She should not think like a politician playing to U.S. audiences. Much of her best work as Secretary of State will be seen by no one, advancing the interests of the president and the country without making a media ripple.

Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images
 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

ALWAYSFORHILLARY

9:08 PM ET

February 6, 2009

HILLARY'S FIRST TRIP

I have complete faith in this woman. I KNOW she knows what she is doing. She will not make any mistakes. She is and will continue to be a STRONG, COMPETENT LEADER. She should have been our president (IF OBAMA HAD NOT STOLEN IT FROM HER WITH HIS CAUCUS FRAUD). But since she was willing to let us have the first Affirmative Action president, I feel so much SAFER knowing Hillary is our Secretary of State.

 

HILLARY CLINTON ARMY

9:38 PM ET

February 6, 2009

She will be the greatest

She will be the greatest Secretary of state our country has ever seen!
Go Hillary!

 

TERRYDO

12:33 AM ET

February 7, 2009

Obama needs help not Hillary R. Clinton!

Obama was not ready on day one (1) and he is losing the confidence of even his most staunch supporters.

Perhaps your guests like David Rothkopf et al should be advising Obama on how not to F*** Up since he sliding rapidly and tumbling down the rabbit hole...

 

NYCGIRL

3:09 AM ET

February 7, 2009

Coming up for air

I think Hillary should avoid photographers who get all arty with their camera angles. What's up with that picture? It looks like she's coming up for air. (Yes, I know the O Admin is already a sinking ship ...) Anyway, it's a nice shot of the chandelier.

 

RANDY1

8:46 PM ET

February 7, 2009

Yes. What is up with the

Yes. What is up with the media trying to find the worst moment, the worst pose, the worst angle with Hillary. It seems like there is a competition to pick the the least flattering picture, whether it's her confirmation hearings, New Year's Eve, or her daily press briefings. Shame on the media.

 

DOODLE

6:13 PM ET

February 7, 2009

trip

she will go ,do the work, and come home..she knew this needed to be done right when she took the job..again I say she wants the results..not the glory..she won't be going on a "press junket" with the people 3 weeks into her job..she does not need the stroking for her ego like the Pres. does...she is a woman who believes the person she needs to impress is HERSELF...love THAT attitude!!!

 

STILL4HILL

7:56 PM ET

February 8, 2009

You don't know Hillary

These comments appear to be made by people who never bothered to find out who Hillary is or how she operates.

1. Listening? Hillary has always listened. She listened to us with compassion. Obama never even bothered to ask our opinion.

2. Eye contact? Um did you see those photos this week at the Prayer breakfast and on this page with the foreign dignitaries? HELLO!? Hillary makes direct eye contact all the time with those huge baby blue eyes - it's very powerful and sexy. It's Obama who cannot look anyone in the eye - he's shifty.

3. Campaigning? Hillary is quite finished campaigning. It's Obama who can't seem to shift gears. He's stuck in the campaign mode. She's taking care of business.

When are the these wiseguys going to realize she has them by at least 50 IQ points? And if you guys don't see how gorgeous and sexy she is, clearly the Europeans do, and for that matter women do.

Keep taking your goofy pics, we'll be group-hugging Hillary.

 

SAKEL

8:19 PM ET

February 8, 2009

Rothkopf should have taken Hillary's N.Y. "Listening Tours"!...

It certainly looks as if David Rothkopf hasn't ever attended Hillary's N.Y. famous "Listening Tours". Had he been a little more well-read on the subject matter he wouldn't even have made this superfluously whiny suggestion! Come on, now David, if there's one lecture Hillary doesn't need from you lecturing guys is to..."listen". Her last middle name is not "Hussein"--it's "Diane" and lacking "Judgment" and "substance" and "listening skills" weren't part of her resume that were debatable during the primary, remember! Although the same, unfortuantely, cannot be said of the current prez....

 

SAKEL

8:27 PM ET

February 8, 2009

Still-4=Hill....you said it! Hillary is galaxies ahead...

Perfectly expressed, Still-4-Hill above! I agree with your astute assessment of the ignoramuses that portray themselves as "critics" of HRC. They have, obviously, never seen nor observed Hillary's phenomenal dedication to public service and issues of substance over the last couple of decades. Neither have they seen the relief in major cities abroad upon being advised of HRC's ascendancy to the SoS post! They have a tremendous amount of respect for her diplomatic charms--while knowing damn well she means business! She's apotheosis of "Diplomacy with Teeth". And the nerdy 'foreign policy experts' better get used to this and quite hiding behind their cowardly academic misogyny. It's transparent to us by now. They should go back to their ivy towers and do some more homework.

 

NYCGIRL

12:17 AM ET

February 9, 2009

Nothing new to Hillary

People seem to forget that Hillary interacted with numerous heads of state and foreign dignitaries for EIGHT YEARS when she was First Lady. When I read that she and the German Foreign Minister already have a "warm working relationship" because they have been friends since Bill was Prez, it brought a smile to my face. There is no substitute for this kind of "experience".

Dealing with foreign affairs is nothing new to Hillary. We are lucky that she has consented to represent us to the world.

 

STILL4HILL

12:30 AM ET

February 9, 2009

Thanks, sakel...

...and ditto to your posts. The press, with its mouth and fingers duct-taped into silence about the REAL news, e.g. the POTUS eligibility issue that won't go away, and now 10 states with bills or resolutions reaffirming 10th Amendment rights, continues to aim at Hillary. Despicable!

 

FARACK

3:14 PM ET

February 9, 2009

Obama and Hillary

Wow. The bitterness of the Hillary partisans is absolutely astounding - and a sad indication of the inability of progressives to bury differences, and act in a coherent fashion. What you simpletons do not understand is that behind the scenes there was a great deal of cordiality between the two camps, and that Obama made an incredibly gracious and intelligent decision in appointing Hillary as Secretary of State, a post she is eminently qualified for.

I, personally, am thrilled at the one-two punch that is Obama and Hillary. They both speak to the world in unique ways that help round out the diplomatic strength the U.S. enjoys at the moment.

The perverse glee wounded Hillaryites (people Hillary does not want to be associated with, by the way) are expressing when they claim Obama is already a failure (a ridiculous assertion at this stage of the game) is disgusting.

It's time to get behind this Administration, as the American public has, and help make it work.

 

NYCGIRL

10:32 PM ET

February 9, 2009

No, thanks

Wait!

Are you inviting us "simpletons" -- the "bitter", "perverse" and "wounded" "Hillary partisans" -- to "bury differences", and "get behind" the "incredibly gracious and intelligent" Obama Admin. and "help make it work"???

That's very thoughtful of you, but no thanks. I am not worthy. I'll just stand by and admire all of you from afar.

(Bows, and backs away humbly ...)

 

FARACK

2:55 PM ET

February 10, 2009

Sure

I am open to being convinced that you are not simpletons, of course......

 

NYCGIRL

3:47 PM ET

February 10, 2009

No, we're not worthy

Oh, no. We lowly Hillaryites are just not worthy of such magnitude on your part. But please, by all means, DO carry on without us. We are happy to watch.

 

FARACK

7:25 PM ET

February 13, 2009

I wouldn't call Hillaryites

I wouldn't call Hillaryites lowly, as I am one myself. I even supported her in the primaries. I just also happen to be a supporter of the Obama Administration as a whole (as is Hillary). The idea that Obama somehow stole this election, and is therefore not worthy of being accepted as the President, is ridiculous.

 

NYCGIRL

4:52 AM ET

February 15, 2009

Good luck!

You "even supported her in the primaries"?? I guess that's the ultimate treason for an Obama supporter.

We Hillaryites are still struggling to get out from under the bus Obama threw us under. You don't need us, remember?You're on your own. Good luck!

 

FARACK

3:16 PM ET

February 17, 2009

Hillary doesn't need you

Hillary doesn't need you either. You're a very shrill minority at this point in time - shouting at a void.

 

SAKEL

3:42 PM ET

February 10, 2009

CAROLYN, WILL YOU PLEASE

CAROLYN,

WILL YOU PLEASE UPDATE THIS BLOG. OR IS MADAM SECRETARY NOT PART OF THE FOREIGN POST? SINCE FEB.6TH, THERE HAS BEEN NO DISCERNIBLE NEWS ON SOS.

FOREIGN POST: KINDLY INFORM YOUR READERS!!!!!!!!

 

SAKEL

3:48 PM ET

February 10, 2009

Is "Farack" the synonym for Obamyopic Affliction?

I checked the etymological roots of this word (f, not b) and it appears that some linguistic scribe has deemed it "an incurable affliction otherwise known as 'obamyopia'.

 

FARACK

7:27 PM ET

February 13, 2009

Accepting the fact that Obama

Accepting the fact that Obama is the President of the United States is an affliction? An interesting view you have of 80% of the American public.

 

PETERINDC

2:58 PM ET

February 23, 2009

Asia Trip Review

One of the more interesting features of Clinton's diplomacy is the lack of the typical diplomatic candor the world has come to expect from the State Department. She spoke very bluntly about the possibility of a succession crisis in North Korea. Typically eulogizing about a dictator is supposed to come after his fall. Many observers have commented that such comments put North Korea in a difficult position to save face.

However, I don't think those comments were for the North Korean leadership, but for the South Korean public. Clinton made her trip to Seoul in order to shore up Washington-Seoul relations. She will allow her minions (Stephen Bosworth, particularly) to figure out the future of Washington-Pyongyang relations.

Clinton's comments were a subtle message to The 2MB administration (Lee-Myung-Bak for those less frequent Korea observers), or more importantly, to those questions whether Lee and Obama would get along. Where the nuclear issue has been the main focus, Clinton tipped her hat to the fact that South Korean's need to be realistic about the future of North Korea.

Writing several days before Clinton's arrival, Lee Byong-chul, a senior fellow at a nonpartisan policy advisory body based in Seoul, commented in the Korea Times that, "Obama needs to tell Kim Jong-il, 67, to forget India and focus on the threat from within over power succession."

B.C. Lee probably imagined a less direct message, the message should have been clear to the Korean populace: the Obama administration backs President Lee's sensible approach to North Korea. Such a conclusion is even more clear with the loud squeal that came from the ultra-left Hankyoreh newspaper. If being more realistic about North Korean issues is important, then the October 4 Declaration or June 15th Joint Statement (in unification-speak meaning unconditional flow of money to North Korea) mean very little to the new administration.

 

Madam Secretary is an obsessive blog about all things Hillary Clinton. From her policies to her pantsuits, Madam Secretary delivers up-to-the-minute news, analysis, and gossip about America's top diplomat.