Hillary has always inspired as much devotion on the left as she has wild-eyed ranting/irrational hatred on the right. But her nearly-successful run for the Democratic presidential nomination brought her a new group of dedicated fans, as well as a cheering section that all but abandoned real support of her and her political views once the race was over.

For those people, some of whom adopted the acronym P.U.M.A. (or Party Unity My A** in response to calls by Democrats -- including Hillary -- to come together to elect Barack Obama), there is no president who could be better than Hillary, no vice presidential pick that wasn't a slight. Some of them would even call the secretary of state slot a "safe, expected place for a woman to be," in order to denigrate the selection of yet another woman for the position, even if that woman is Hillary Clinton.

For them, calling Barack Obama a feminist -- as this month's Ms. cover does -- is a slap in the face to everything they believe in, which, at this point, has little to do with the policies and principles for which Hillary has fought much of her political life. For many of these supposed supporters, their support for Hillary stopped being about Hillary or her political future many months ago. And as many of them are political neophytes, tomorrow's hearing will be about who abused their supposed idol or asked her too-tough questions or proved themselves to be sexist by asking her questions as though - gasp - she were any other nominee for the position.

The rest of her supporters, well, they'll be checking out her suit and her hair and listening to what she has to say about Gaza, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Darfur, Russia, Georgia, 3 AM phone calls and all the rest of it. And we'll be here tomorrow to help with that.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images News

 

NYDEM12

5:20 PM ET

January 14, 2009

A little off...

Let me preface by saying I am 100% behind HRC as SoS...

However, I don't think it's accurate to say the P.U.M.A.'s who complain about HRC taking SoS have stopped supporting her. Granted, they still haven't embraced Obama and are highly sensitive to sexism in politics but how exactly does that hurt HRC? The whole "shut up and support Obama" unity concept was to ensure the Democrats won the Presidency and we did. HRC asked her supporters to vote for Obama because the alternative was farther from her policies. Of course, HRC had to play the political hand she was dealt and will make a brilliant SoS, but that doesn't change the fact that the Democratic party ran a shamelessly flawed primary and Obama was not the person many wanted leading the country for a multitude of reasons. Why should people continue to support Obama and a flawed system no questions asked now that the election is over?

IMO, these hardcore P.U.M.A.'s function to argue and raise the most extreme points on HRC's behalf - points that HRC could never publicly raise herself in the political arena she functions in. I don't see anything wrong with it.

 

SADSTATEOFAFFAIRS

3:49 PM ET

January 15, 2009

The Truth About PUMAs

For the truth about PUMA's click here: http://www.hillarysvillage.net/showthread.php?t=5776

"The central issue for many PUMAs is not merely the result of wild-eyed, gone off the rails obsession with all things Hillary by those who are unenlightened. That is a simplistic interpretation of their legitimate and well-informed political movement. Her inaccurate prediction that PUMAs would have a bitter and biased interpretation of the Secretary of State confirmation hearings is an example of that flawed perception."

 

Madam Secretary is an obsessive blog about all things Hillary Clinton. From her policies to her pantsuits, Madam Secretary delivers up-to-the-minute news, analysis, and gossip about America's top diplomat.