Thursday, September 2, 2010 - 10:47 PM

Secretary Clinton's political experience could be a plus for her as America's diplomat-in-chief during Middle East peace negotiations. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas not only have to agree on smart policies, but they have to go with policies that are palatable to their people. These leaders aren't tackling negotiations purely from the perspective of what is good policy in itself, but what will be politically acceptable with their people.
As a former senator and presidential candidate, Clinton has plenty of experience with having to come up with good policy that's also good politics and approaching policy debates with an eye for what's politically sellable. In that sense, she has an asset that many of her predecessors -- Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and Madeleine Albright -- don't. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, now a representative of the Middle East "Quartet," told ABC News, as seen in the video below, that Clinton has the "best type of political mind" because it "knows where you meet the point of principle and knows where you need the subtlety and the compromise."
Of course, this is the first time Clinton has been a mediator in such a formidable challenge, so you never know how it'll go. "I think she has credibility. Now whether that translates into diplomatic skills, I don't know. Frankly, she's untested as a mediator," Shibley Telhami, a University of Maryland professor who recently wrote a piece for FP, told ABC News, as seen in the video below.
Still, Clinton's political experience counts for something. Plus, she has this relationship with this fellow who has engaged in Mideast peace talks -- maybe she has learned some lessons from his experience.
Jason Reed-Pool/Getty Images
Friday, March 26, 2010 - 6:46 PM
FP blogger Daniel Drezner asked yesterday, "Should the Secretary of State be involved in domestic lobbying?"
Drezner cites reports that Secretary Clinton made calls and attempted to persuade on-the-fence lawmakers to support the health-care reform bill that passed the House Sunday. Clearly, lobbying on domestic health-care reform is outside the job description of the position of U.S. secetary of state, but as Drezner mentions, Clinton isn't your typical secretary of state -- she's one who has special expertise in health-care reform.
Given that expertise, and the political capital she has, I suppose it's OK for Clinton to lobby for health-care reform as long as it doesn't conflict with her foreign-policy duties and doesn't take time away from the international matters that she must attend to.
What do you all think? Express your opinion in the FP poll above.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Monday, July 6, 2009 - 2:37 PM
Since Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin announced her resignation on July 3, many people have contrasted her with Secretary Clinton in terms of weathering criticism.
Clinton has been through a lot: a repeatedly unfaithful husband, a failed healthcare reform effort, a grueling presidential primary challenge against Barack Obama. So has Palin: a son with Down syndrome, a pregnant teenage daughter, a son in the military overseas, a stumbling Katie Couric interview, a tough presidential election, all sorts of investigations.
Clinton never backed down though. Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus wrote yesterday:
Note to soon-to-be-former Gov. Sarah Palin: Big girls don't quit.
Just ask Hillary Clinton. Crying -- or at least misting up a little -- you can get away with these days. But quitting? Not until you absolutely have to, and even then you might hold on for a few extra weeks.
John P. Coale, a Washington lawyer who helped Palin set up a political action committee told the Washington Post of a conversation he had with Palin this spring:
"She asked me, 'Well, what do you think all this is? Why are all these people attacking me?'" Coale said. "I said to her: 'Look, that's what happens. They did it to Hillary [Rodham Clinton], and Hillary just pushed through it. It's not going to really stop. … You just have to ignore it and move on.'"
Ironically, when Clinton complained about criticism during last year's primary campaign, yet-to-be-candidate Palin said, "[Clinton] does herself a disservice" and said Clinton needed to "plow through that" and "know what you're getting into." Palin said that Clinton's "perceived whine" about "excess criticism" doesn't do "women in general" any good. About tough criticism, Palin said, "Fair or unfair, it's there. I think that's reality, and I think it's a given." (Hear Palin's entire comment in the video above or over at Wonkette.)
I have to muse, though: If politics were less of a "superficial, wasteful political blood sport" (as Palin characterizes it), would more women participate? There are a lot of people -- women and men -- who want to improve their country but don't want to descend to the level of stepping in the muck and engage in mudslinging.
Once again, though, Palin reveals her hypocrisy: She has indulged in political blood sport herself (accusing Barack Obama of "palling around with terrorists"). Plus, with her aeriel wolf hunting, shouldn't she be comfortable with blood sport?
Thursday, June 11, 2009 - 4:15 PM
An Associated Press headline I came across this morning: "McAuliffe defeat another blow to Clinton legacy"
For those of you who don't keep up with Virginia politics, Terry McAuliffe (the former chairman of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, seen above on May 13, 2008, at a primary-night celebration in Charleston, W.Va.) was recently defeated in Virginia's Democratic gubernatorial primary. The longtime fundraiser and friend of the Clintons received plenty of support from Bill Clinton. The former president made appearances at five rallies, spoke in radio ads and telephone robocalls, and attended a fundraiser (in fact, McAuliffe raised almost double what the primary winner, Creigh Deeds, did).
Deeds ended up winning 10 of Virginia's 11 congressional districts, however, an outcome that the article says leads to one conclusion: "The Clinton star power doesn't necessarily translate into votes."
Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Tuesday, March 24, 2009 - 3:59 PM
Hillary: The Movie, the anti-Hillary documentary created by the conservative group Citizens United, is the subject of arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court today. The court will determine whether such type of political movies should be regulated the way that political ads are during election seasons.
More from the Associated Press here.