Wednesday, March 24, 2010 - 3:32 PM
In marking World Water Day on Monday at the National Geographic Society in Washington, Clinton said:
Experts predict … that by 2025, just 15 years from now, nearly two-thirds of the world's countries will be water-stressed. Many sources of freshwater will be under additional strain from climate change and population growth. And 2.4 billion people will face absolute water scarcity -- the point at which a lack of water threatens social and economic development. […]
Access to reliable supplies of clean water is a matter of human security. It's also a matter of national security. And that's why President Obama and I recognize that water issues are integral to the success of many of our major foreign-policy initiatives.
For more about water, check out this week's FP photo slide show, "The Big Thirsty," and last year's special quiz about water.
ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images (Image from May 12, 2008)
Thursday, December 17, 2009 - 3:47 PM

Over at Passport, the top story on today's Morning Brief is Secretary Clinton's last-minute efforts at the climate-change talks in Copenhagen:
In an 11th hour proposal to save the ailing UN Climate talks in Copenhagen and have some agreement on the table by the time U.S. President Barack Obama comes to town tomorrow, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposed that developed countries including the United States come up with $100 billion per year over the next decade to help poor countries fight climate change. This represented a tactical shift from the Obama administration, which has been reluctant to put a dollar amount on aid as climate legislation remains stuck in the senate.
"We're running out of time," Clinton said.
Clinton appealed to countries to drop the "us versus them" mentality when it comes to climate change and unite in order to come to an accord:
We have lost precious time in these past days. In the time we have left here, it can no longer be about us versus them -- this group of nations pitted against that group. We all face the same challenge together."
I hope Clinton's star power will get countries to come to an agreement, but I don't feel too optimistic about global accords given that the Doha round of trade talks has been going on since 2001 over at the World Trade Organization. Plus, as the recent FP article "Recipe for Failure" details, computer modeling by Bruce Bueno de Mesquita predicts that the Copenhagen talks will fail -- and the CIA says he has a 90 percent accuracy rate.
Photo: OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images
Monday, July 20, 2009 - 3:39 PM
Yesterday, things got a bit heated between Secretary Clinton and Indian Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh when it came to climate change.
As the two toured a "green" building near New Delhi while dozens of cameras rolled, Ramesh said, "India's position, let me be clear, is that we are simply not in the position to take legally binding emissions targets."
Clinton responded: "No one wants to in any way stall or undermine the economic growth that is necessary to lift millions more out of poverty. …We also believe that there is a way to eradicate poverty and develop sustainability that will lower significantly the carbon footprint."
After the tour, the U.S. and Indian delegations had a closed-door meeting that once again began with tension. Ramesh delivered a blunt four-minute opening statement declaring, "There is simply no case for the pressure that we, who have among the lowest emissions per capita, face to actually reduce emissions."
Clinton countered that the per capita logic "loses force" as developing countries quickly become the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases.
Ramesh's rejoinder: "We look upon you suspiciously because you have not fulfilled what [developed countries] pledged to fulfill," referring to it as a "crisis of credibility."
After the meeting, though, Clinton announced that the discussion was "very fruitful" and pointed out, "We have many more areas of agreement than perhaps had been appreciated."
Climate change is definitely a sensitive issue for large and rapidly developing countries such as India and China. It can look hypocritical for rich countries to demand that poor countries curb emissions when rich countries themselves pollute more per capita and historically increased their pollution levels as their people became wealthier.
Clinton said it's possible to eliminate poverty and develop sustainably at the same time. I really hope these "green" technologies pull through to save the day. But even with green technologies and more environmental awareness, it's gonna be tough. Last Friday, the first Tata Nano was delivered.
Photo: PRAKASH SINGH/AFP/Getty Images
Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 2:04 PM
In honor of Earth Day, Secretary Clinton's schedule is very "green" today.
9:30 a.m. Testimony before House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2172.
2:45 p.m. Keynote Address at State Department’s “Greening Diplomacy” Earth Day Event, in the Dean Acheson Auditorium.
4:20 p.m. Remarks at Global Philanthropy Forum Conference in the Grand Ballroom of the Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.
6:00 p.m. Guest of Honor/Humanitarian Award Recipient/Keynote Speaker at the Earth Day Gala hosted by the Ambassador of Kuwait and Mrs. Al-Sabah, at the Ambassador’s Residence.
Meanwhile, husband Bill and President Obama were going green yesterday:

U.S. President Barack Obama watches as former President Bill Clinton participates in a tree planting event at the Kenilworth Aquatic Gardens April 21 in Washington. The event was organized by the Student Conservation Association, an AmeriCorps organization. On April 21, Obama signed the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act that intends to more than triple the AmeriCorps volunteers to over 250,000, costing taxpayers roughly a billion dollars a year over the next five years.
Photo: Martin H. Simon-Pool/Getty Images